The growing rifts between city Tycoon Hamis Kiggundu and Diamond Trust Bank continues to raise a lot of mixed reactions among nationals.
Though they mogil has been witnessed several times crying for government intervention and bailout on the huge bank loan but it seems this might not be possible since both Ham Enterprises and Diamond Trust Bank are all business operating in the country therefore they must all be protected by the same government.
This implies that everyone has to play his part, Ham should pay up the money which the bank demands rather than using monkey tricks of coming with musicians in court and lamenting before cameras.
“I advise Ham to pay DTB Kenya their money. There is no way out of this. At least he can pay without interest. The Bank will not lose. Ham will lose.” Said one Ronald Muhinda
Recently, the Court of Appeal ruled that a Kampala businessman, Hamis Kiggundu (Ham) was wrongly awarded the UGX 120 billion compensation by the Commercial court last year.
In a unanimous decision of justices Kenneth Kakuru, Christopher Madrama and the DCJ Richard Buteera, the case file involving Hamis Kiggundu and Diamond Trust Bank has been sent back to the Commercial Court for a retrial after establishing that the Highcourt judge Henery Peter Adonyo did not address himself on the merits of the case before deciding it on a point of law.
The judges have faulted justice Adonyo for applying a principle in matters where a defendant refused to file a defence.
However, in this case, Diamond Trust Bank had already filed its defence which the judge chose to ignore hence wrongly announcing the compensation award to Ham.
The court of Appeal has now ordered that the case is retried on all issues and a judgement is entered on merit as Ham has been condemned to pay the costs of the appeal.
The above orders are rising from an filed by Diamond Trust Bank contesting an order by the commercial court to pay Kiggundu UGX 120 billion after the Commercial court found out that its partner Diamond Trust Bank Kenya, from whom Kiggundu borrowed the money, had no operating licence to carry out business in Uganda.
The decision was based on a suit filed by Kiggundu, through his companies; Ham Enterprises and Kiggs International, against DTB Bank. He accused the banks of illegally taking out more than UGX 120 billion from his bank account in Uganda.
Kiggundu stated that between 2011 and 2016 his companies were given loans totalling UGX 41 billion by both DTB Uganda and Kenya and he deposited with them several properties as security.
However, Kiggundu said that as his companies were repaying the loans, he realized UGX 34 billion was illegally removed from his shillings account and USD 23 million from the dollar account.
In the aftermath, Commercial Court Judge Adonyo agreed with Kiggundu and ruled that the credit facilities offered by DTB-Kenya to Kiggundu were illegal since the bank is not licensed to carry out the financial institution business in Uganda.
Adonyo also ordered the banks to return the properties that Kiggundu had mortgaged citing that the evidence on record indicates that all the loans obtained were fully settled. He also ordered the refund of the monies the banks had deducted illegally from his accounts.
However, Kigundu and his lawyer Fred Muwema are to appeal the retrial order.