The Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF) has requested UGX138.4 billion to ensure security during the 2026 general elections, a proposal that has raised concerns among Members of Parliament (MPs).
Critics are questioning both the substantial financial demand and the Army’s involvement in activities traditionally managed by the Uganda Police Force.
During a January 23, 2025, meeting of Parliament’s Budget Committee and the Defence and Internal Affairs Committee, Kira Municipality MP Ibrahim Ssemujju criticized the allocation, suggesting it reflects inefficiencies and overlaps.
“The Army is asking for UGX138 billion for elections, while Police wants over UGX300 billion for the same activities. Elections are matters of law and order, which fall under Police. Is the Army’s involvement an indication that the Police has become too weak to handle internal security?” Ssemujju asked.
He also questioned whether this budget signals the militarization of the electoral process. “Why are elections increasingly treated like military operations?” Ssemujju added, emphasizing the need for clarity on why such large sums are required from both agencies.
Defending the UPDF’s financial request, Linos Ngopek, Vice Chairperson of the Defence Committee, argued that collaboration between security agencies is crucial during elections.
“Police often seeks support from sister agencies during elections. This funding ensures readiness to assist Police when necessary,” Ngopek said.
Rosette Byengoma, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Defence and Veteran Affairs, clarified that the UGX138.4 billion would cover logistics, operational preparedness, and protection for MPs.
“These funds are critical to securing the 2026 general elections, ensuring smooth campaign operations and protecting key stakeholders,” she explained.
Despite these explanations, some MPs remain skeptical about the financial requests. The Police Force has already requested over UGX300 billion, bringing the total security-related election expenditure to over UGX438 billion.
Many lawmakers worry this signals inefficient budgeting and an overreliance on military intervention in civilian matters.
The discussion also touched on broader concerns about the management of Uganda’s security sector, including controversial comments made on social media by Chief of Defence Forces Muhoozi Kainerugaba.
While this issue was largely dismissed by the Defence Committee, it underscored the need for accountability and transparency in the sector.
As the 2026 elections approach, scrutiny over these financial allocations and the roles of various security agencies will likely intensify, with MPs calling for assurance that the funds are necessary and properly utilized.
